Why the study?
Does individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity prevent endless loop tachycardia in patients with DDD or VDD pacemakers?
Does individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity prevent endless loop tachycardia in patients with DDD or VDD pacemakers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity can prevent endless loop tachycardia in patients with dual chamber pacemakers without limiting the upper rate by prolonging PVARP.
Endless loop tachycardia (ELT) is a possible complication in dual chamber pacing; it is usually prevented by programming the atrial refractory period (PVARP) longer than the retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction interval; this in some patients limits the upper rate. In 15 patients with a DDD (nine patients) or a single-pass lead VDD pacemaker (six patients) and retrograde atrial activation, telemetric recording documented a significant difference in amplitude of antegrade, and retrograde atrial potentials (VDD 1.21 +/- 0.32 mV vs 0.56 +/- 0.23 mV, P = 0.008; DDD 2.7 +/- 1 vs 1.8 +/- 1 mV, P = 0.038; Student's t-test for paired data). In 3/15 patients ELT stopped after programming of atrial sensitivity to a value greater than the retrograde P wave amplitude; in 11/15 patients this occurred at a sensing value lower than or equal to retrograde P wave amplitude with a high pass band filter operating. One patient required PVARP lengthening. Holter monitoring showed no more ELTs. In most patients with a DDD or single-pass lead VDD pacemaker with widely programmable sensing amplitude and Hi/Low bandpass filters, individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity prevents ELT without affecting the PVARP and, consequently, upper rate limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rognoni et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: