Why the study?
Does baroreceptor feedback modify circulatory responses to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia in cats?
Does baroreceptor feedback modify circulatory responses to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia in cats?
Baroreceptor feedback significantly attenuates the increases in arterial pressure and muscle vascular resistance elicited by noxious stimuli in anaesthetized cats, an effect not altered by metoprolol.
Baroreflex attenuates hemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli in anesthetized cats; leaves open relevance to human perioperative care.
In eight cats anaesthetized with chloralose, the carotid sinus on one side was either exposed to systemic arterial pressure or perfused with a pump in order to control sinus pressure. Baroreceptor influences from the contralateral carotid sinus and from the aortic arch were interrupted by denervation. Arrangements were made for intermittent electric stimulation of pain fibres in somatic and visceral nerves with stimulation parameters chosen to elicit reproducible increases in arterial blood pressure and in skeletal muscle vascular resistance. The elicited increases in arterial pressure and muscle vascular resistance were both about 40% smaller when the carotid sinus was exposed to systemic arterial pressure in comparison with the experimental condition of a constant carotid sinus pressure. I.v. metoprolol (0.1-0.3 mg kg-1) reduced base-line arterial pressure, but did not attenuate the arterial blood pressure increase in response to pain stimulation. The baroreceptor modulation of the haemodynamic response to the pain stimulation was not affected by metoprolol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biber et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: