Why the study?
Does blood pH monitoring predict cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does blood pH monitoring predict cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction?
This preliminary study explores whether continuous blood pH monitoring can predict cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Should not change practice in AMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical role.
CLINICIANS recognize the importance of continuous electrocardiographic surveillance in immediately alerting the attending staff of a cardiac catastrophe and in monitoring the various measures designed to restore normal cardiac function.¹⁻³Ideally, it would be more desirable to identify the earliest recognizable event that might predict a cardiac arrest. The question raised herein is whether the metabolic acidosis observed after a cardiac arrest (ventricular fibrillation or asystole) is solely secondary or whether this also may precede and contribute to the environment that provokes the development of these arrhythmias. If the latter were true, then such monitoring of the pH would be a valuable adjunct to electrical monitoring of the acutely ill patient. This preliminary paper reports our experience with pH monitoring in critically ill patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock. Subjects and Methods Ten patients with acute myocardial infarction were studied in the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert A. Cohen (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: