Why the study?
Although the D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio is a recognized biomarker in ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism, few studies have evaluated its relationship with cardiovascular disease.
Does an elevated D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio predict all-cause and cardiac mortality in patients with CAD after undergoing PCI?
Does an elevated D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio predict all-cause and cardiac mortality in patients with CAD after undergoing PCI?
An elevated D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (≥ 0.52) is an independent predictor of long-term all-cause and cardiac mortality in patients with CAD following PCI.
The role of activation of the coagulation and fibrinolysis system in the pathogenesis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has drawn wide attention. Recently, the D-dimer to fibrinogen ratio (DFR) is considered as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke and pulmonary embolism. However, few studies have explored the relationship between DFR and cardiovascular disease. In our study, patients were divided into 2 groups according to DFR value: the lower group (DFR < 0.52, n = 2123) and the higher group (DFR ≥ 0.52, n = 1073). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The average follow-up time was 37.59 ± 22.24 months. We found that there were significant differences between the 2 groups in term of ACM (2.4% vs 6.6%, P < 0.001) and CM (1.5% vs 4.0%, P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that elevated DFR had higher incidences of ACM (log rank P < 0.001) and CM (log rank P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that DFR was an independent predictor of ACM (HR = 1.743, 95%CI: 1.187-2.559 P = 0.005) and CM (HR = 1.695, 95%CI: 1.033-2.781 P = 0.037). This study indicates that DFR is an independent and novel predictor of long-term ACM and CM in post-PCI patients with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: