Why the study?
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect significant coronary artery stenoses in patients scheduled for coronary angiography?
Does transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect significant coronary artery stenoses in patients scheduled for coronary angiography?
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography using pSPVR and colour flow aliasing offers high specificity for detecting significant coronary stenoses, with high sensitivity in the LM and LAD but lower sensitivity in the Cx and RCA.
High specificity supports potential rule-out in LM/LAD; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: Our aim was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosing significant coronary artery stenoses using peak stenotic to prestenotic velocity ratio (pSPVR) measurements when compared with results from quantitative coronary angiography and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients scheduled for coronary angiography were studied using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Stenoses were identified by local colour aliasing by colour flow Doppler, and further evaluated by pSPVR, using a pSPVR of ≥2.0 as a cut-off for significant stenosis. When pSPVR could not be measured, local mosaic coronary flow pattern at Nyquist limit ≥0.48 m/s was used. Sixty-five lesions suggestive of stenosis were found by TTE. Combining findings of pSPVR ≥2.0 and local mosaic flow at Nyquist limit ≥0.48 m/s, the sensitivity and specificity of demonstrating significant stenoses (diameter stenosis, 50-99%) in the left main coronary artery (LM), left anterior descending coronary (LAD), left circumflex coronary (Cx), and right coronary artery (RCA) were 75 and 98%, 74 and 95%, 40 and 87%, and 34 and 98%, respectively. The pSPVR did not differ significantly between arteries with reduced and normal CFVR, with a cut-off of CFVR <2.0. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of pSPVR ≥2.0 or localized colour flow aliasing are useful in the non-invasive diagnosis of significant coronary disease in the three main coronary arteries, with high specificity for detecting significant stenoses. These findings showed high sensitivity for identifying significant stenoses in the LM and LAD, but showed lower ability to detect those lesions in the Cx and RCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holte et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: