Why the study?
Does CFVR measured by CE-TTDE accurately predict ischemia compared to stress thallium-201 imaging in patients with intermediate LAD stenosis?
Observational (n=50)
Does CFVR measured by CE-TTDE accurately predict ischemia compared to stress thallium-201 imaging in patients with intermediate LAD stenosis?
CFVR assessed by CE-TTDE accurately predicts ischemia on stress thallium imaging for intermediate LAD lesions, whereas angiographic stenosis does not.
May support CE-TTDE-derived CFVR for ischemia prediction in intermediate LAD stenosis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Visual or quantitative assessment of coronary angiography may not exactly predict the physiological significance of intermediate (40-70%) coronary stenosis. Coronary flow reserve is a well-established marker of the functional significance of coronary stenosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) using contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (CE-TTDE) with thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate lesions in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). METHODS: A consecutive series of 50 patients with intermediate stenosis in the LAD underwent pharmacological stress thallium-201 imaging and CFVR measured by CE-TTDE. RESULTS: CFVR could be measured in 49 of 50 patients by the present method. A CFVR <2.0 predicted the presence of a stress thallium defect in 12 of 14 patients (agreement=90%, kappa=0.76, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of CFVR for stress thallium-201 results were 86 and 91%, respectively. In contrast, significant stenosis (>50% by diameter) showed fair agreement for stress thallium defects (agreement=59%, kappa=0.28, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of intermediate lesions in the LAD, CFVR as assessed by CE-TTDE could accurately predict the presence of ischemia on stress thallium imaging, whereas angiographic stenosis did not yield reliable results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okayama et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Intermediate stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery (n=50). Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) using contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (CE-TTDE) vs. Angiographic stenosis (>50% by diameter) was evaluated on Presence of a stress thallium defect (agreement 90%, kappa 0.76, p=< 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: