Why the study?
Does transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography accurately measure coronary blood flow reserve compared to invasive Doppler guidewire ultrasonography in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Does transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography accurately measure coronary blood flow reserve compared to invasive Doppler guidewire ultrasonography in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography provides an accurate, noninvasive alternative to invasive Doppler guidewire ultrasonography for measuring coronary blood flow reserve in the left anterior descending artery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive CFR assessment in ischemic heart disease; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The development of new ultrasound instrumentation has made epicardial coronary artery blood flow imaging easier with the use of transthoracic coronary Doppler echocardiography (TCDE). This study was performed to investigate the accuracy of coronary blood flow reserve (CFR) measurement by TCDE. In 15 patients with ischemic heart disease in the absence of valvular disease or atrial fibrillation, coronary flow at rest and flow with hyperemia induced by intravenous dipyridamole infusion were recorded by TCDE and Doppler guidewire ultrasonography. The CFR was determined as the ratio of the maximum hyperemic diastolic time-averaged peak velocity to the velocity at rest in the proximal or distal left anterior descending coronary artery. It was found that the CFR of the left anterior descending coronary artery measured by TCDE was comparable in accuracy with CFR measured by invasive methods (r = 0.87, P < 0.0001, n = 15).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KURIKI et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: