Why the study?
Can transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect and quantify LAD restenosis compared to quantitative coronary angiography in patients with recurrent angina after PTCA?
Can transthoracic Doppler echocardiography accurately detect and quantify LAD restenosis compared to quantitative coronary angiography in patients with recurrent angina after PTCA?
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is a reliable, non-invasive method for detecting and quantifying LAD restenosis after coronary angioplasty.
May support noninvasive LAD restenosis detection post-PTCA; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We investigated the capability of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) to detect and quantify the severity of restenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We studied 10 consecutive patients assigned for quantitative coronary angiography (qCA) due to a recurrent angina pectoris after PTCA of the LAD. The LAD was visualized by TTE, and the presence of local turbulence and an increase in the blood flow velocity was regarded to indicate coronary stenosis. To assess the severity of the stenosis, the increase of blood flow velocity was measured. Angiography showed stenoses of various degrees (27-100%) in all patients. All stenoses were detectable using TTE. Moreover, the ratio of maximal blood flow velocity at the site of stenosis to the pre-stenotic blood flow velocity (M/P-ratio) correlated significantly with the reduction of the luminal diameter of LAD (r = 0.85, P < 0.003). A M/P-ratio higher than 3.0 predicted a diameter reduction of 50% or higher with sensitivity and specificity of 100% in patients with a subtotal stenosis (n = 9). Our results indicate that stenoses in the LAD could be found and the severity of the stenoses could be quantified reliably with TTE. This approach is totally non-invasive and less expensive than coronary angiography and can be used clinically in clarifying restenosis after coronary angioplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saraste et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Clinical Physiology