Why the study?
Are the 30-day and long-term outcomes of PCI performed in a low-volume military treatment facility comparable to expected outcomes from large registries?
Are the 30-day and long-term outcomes of PCI performed in a low-volume military treatment facility comparable to expected outcomes from large registries?
PCI performed in a low-volume military treatment facility achieved 30-day and long-term survival rates comparable to those expected from large, high-volume registries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PCI at low-volume military facilities; leaves open generalizability beyond this observational cohort.
BACKGROUND: The quality assurance of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) program is particularly important when the volume of procedures is low in the center. PURPOSE: Determine predictors of the 30-day and long-term incidence of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and death from any cause for all PCIs performed at Tripler Army Medical Center from January 2002 to June 2012. METHODS: 929 PCIs were performed in 795 patients, resulting in an average PCI volume of 88 per year. Follow-up data were obtained for 99.8% of the patients at 30 days and for 83% at 3 years. RESULTS: 18 deaths occurred during the first 30 days after PCI, with an observed morality rate of 2.26%. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of death at 30 days: stent thrombosis (OR 96), acute myocardial infarction, hemodynamic instability (OR 47), emergent (OR 17) or salvage (OR 28) PCI, and the need for preprocedural balloon pumping (OR 27). The long-term survival Kaplan-Meier estimates were 94% at 1 year and 90.4% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: The 30-day mortality was similar to the expected mortality based on the risk factors in the New York State Registry model, and long-term survival was comparable with that reported in large registries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fentanes et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: