Why the study?
Does the type of defect (reversible vs persistent) on dipyridamole Tl-201 ECT predict prognosis and myocardial damage in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does the type of defect (reversible vs persistent) on dipyridamole Tl-201 ECT predict prognosis and myocardial damage in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Dipyridamole Tl-201 ECT can identify reversible versus persistent perfusion defects in dilated cardiomyopathy, which correlate with myocardial damage and 2-year survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support prognosis assessment in dilated cardiomyopathy; leaves open whether imaging should guide management.
To clarify the clinical significance of regional myocardial perfusion abnormality of the left ventricle in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 20 patients with DCM underwent dipyridamole Tl-201 emission computed tomography (ECT). The subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 had (n = 9) reversible defects and group 2 (n = 11) had persistent defects only. Group 2 patients significantly advanced heart failure and significantly poorer prognoses than group 1 (55% vs 11% in 2 years survival rate, p less than 0.05). The echocardiographic left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was larger in group 2 than group 1 (68.3 +/- 8.2 mm vs 61.9 +/- 4.0 mm, p less than 0.05) and % fractional shortening was smaller in group 2 than group 1 (18.0 +/- 4.5% vs 24.5 +/- 6.9%, p less than 0.05). Moreover, 12 of the 13 segments with reversible defect showed fairly well preserved left ventricular wall motion, whereas 35 of 58 segments with persistent defect had severely impaired wall motion (1/13 vs 35/58, p less than 0.01). Dipyridamole Tl-201 ECT demonstrated conclusively that the two types of defects (reversible and persistent) are useful to evaluate not only the abnormal myocardial perfusion but also myocardial damage and the prognosis in DCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiotani et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: