Why the study?
Synchronous single-cell coinfection is likely rare in vivo, making delayed secondary infections more probable, but the effect of temporal separation of infections on viral populations was undetermined.
In vitro, a 1-2 hour delay between consecutive norovirus infections establishes a barrier that reduces or prevents superinfection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for norovirus superinfection dynamics; human studies required before any clinical translation.
Viral recombination is a key mechanism in the evolution and diversity of noroviruses. In vivo, synchronous single-cell coinfection by multiple viruses, the ultimate prerequisite to viral recombination, is likely to be a rare event and delayed secondary infections are a more probable occurrence. Here, we determine the effect of a temporal separation of in vitro infections with the two homologous murine norovirus strains MNV-1 WU20 and CW1 on the composition of nascent viral populations. WU20 and CW1 were either synchronously inoculated onto murine macrophage cell monolayers (coinfection) or asynchronously applied (superinfection with varying titres of CW1 at half-hour to 24-h delays). Then, 24 h after initial co-or superinfection, quantification of genomic copy numbers and discriminative screening of plaque picked infectious progeny viruses demonstrated a time-dependent predominance of primary infecting WU20 in the majority of viral progenies. Our results indicate that a time interval from one to two hours onwards between two consecutive norovirus infections allows for the establishment of a barrier that reduces or prevents superinfection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludwig‐Begall et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: