Why the study?
Patients with colorectal cancer deemed high-risk may be denied elective laparoscopic resection due to subjective reasons, prompting a comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic resection in true functional high-risk patients.
Does laparoscopic colorectal resection improve 30-day outcomes in functional high-risk patients with colorectal cancer compared to open surgery?
Does laparoscopic colorectal resection improve 30-day outcomes in functional high-risk patients with colorectal cancer compared to open surgery?
Laparoscopic colorectal resection is safe and reduces surgery-site complications and length of stay compared to open surgery in high-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Laparoscopic resection was associated with fewer surgical-site complications in high-risk patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background: Patients with colorectal cancer deemed to be high-risk may be denied an elective laparoscopic resection due to subjective reasons. A comparison of the 30-day outcomes in true functional high-risk patients who underwent either open or laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of all functional high-risk patients as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test between July 2015 and April 2018 were identified. Anaerobic threshold of <11 mL/kg/minute was used as a physiologic indicator to determine a high-risk patient. Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was ensured. P values were computed via two-sided Fisher's exact test, and the exact Mann–Whitney U-test. Forest plots for relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were displayed on a log scale. Results: One hundred forty-six patients were identified as high-risk. Outcomes demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic benefit in all Clavien–Dindo grades of postoperative complications, but especially in severe complications of grades 3–4 (3.5% versus 10.2%). Readmissions demonstrated a trend to laparoscopic surgery benefit (7% versus 11.8%), as did mortality (1.7% versus 3.4%). The rate of surgery-site complications was higher after open surgery (42.1% versus 22.4%, P = .0201). Wound infections were observed more frequently after open surgery (12.5% versus 1.72%, P = .0280). The estimated risk of all-grade complications was significantly higher after open anterior rectal resection (63.0% versus 29.6%, P = .0281) and there was significantly shorter stay after laparoscopic right colectomy (5 v. 7 days, P = .0490). Conclusions: Laparoscopic approach for colorectal resections in high-risk patients is safe and beneficial compared to open surgery, especially in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of the rectum and right colon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Exarchou et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: