ADP-induced platelet aggregation is mediated by both P2Y1 (rapid/transient) and P2T (sustained) receptors, highlighting the complex purinergic pharmacology of platelets.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Delineates distinct P2Y1 and P2T roles in aggregation phases; leaves open therapeutic translation pending in vivo studies.
In the present study we have investigated the roles of P2Y(1) and P(2T) receptor subtypes in adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation of human platelets in heparinized platelet rich plasma. 2. The response to ADP can be characterized as the initial rate or the maximum or final extent of aggregation. The response profile is determined by the concentration of ADP used, being transient at lower and sustained at higher concentrations. 3. The P2Y(1) receptor antagonist, adenosine-3'-phosphate-5'-phosphate (A3P5P) competitively antagonized the initial rate of aggregation (pK(B) 5. 47) and transformed the response profile to a slowly developing but sustained response. Both maximum and final extents were also inhibited by A3P5P although not in a competitive manner (Schild slope <1). 4. The P(2T) receptor antagonist, AR-C67085, competitively antagonized the final extent of aggregation (pK(B) 8.54), transforming the response profile to one of rapid, transient aggregation. Its effect on maximum extent (the most widely used index of aggregation) was complex, and further supported the involvement of both receptor subtypes in the aggregation response. 5. ADP-induced aggregation is a complex phenomenon, the nature of which is determined by the relative occupancy of the two receptor subtypes. While P2Y(1) receptor activation causes a rapid and transient aggregation, the extent of sustained aggregation is determined by the level of P(2T) receptor occupancy. Hence, detailed analysis of the aggregation response is essential to correctly define the purinergic pharmacology of the platelet and interpretation of results is critically dependent on the response index chosen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jarvis et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: