Why the study?
Does the indirectly derived 1/PEP2 correlate with peak ascending aortic blood-flow acceleration as a measure of myocardial contractile state in dogs?
Does the indirectly derived 1/PEP2 correlate with peak ascending aortic blood-flow acceleration as a measure of myocardial contractile state in dogs?
The quotient 1/PEP2 correlates strongly with peak aortic blood-flow acceleration and may serve as a noninvasive expression of myocardial contractile state.
Supports noninvasive contractility assessment in experimental models; leaves open human validation before clinical consideration.
The relationship between peak ascending aortic blood-flow acceleration and the cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) was studied in five chronically prepared dogs. Acceleration was measured as the first derivative of the signal from a flow probe placed around the aortic root. PEP was derived indirectly by subtracting left ventricular ejection time (obtained from a central arterial pressure signal) from the total active electromechanical time (the Q-S2 interval measured from the ECG and heart sounds). Resulting values of PEP were inverted and squared so that they shared a common time unit with acceleration-time−2. Comparison of 1/PEP2 and peak acceleration produced correlation coefficients from 0.74 to 0.96. A linear relationship between these two measurements was maintained over a sixfold change in the inotropic state of the heart. The quotient 1/PEP2 appears to be an easily obtainable, potentially noninvasive expression of the myocardial contractile state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reitan et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: