Why the study?
Does a quality improvement intervention improve the prescription and implementation of DVT prophylaxis in general surgical patients?
Does a quality improvement intervention improve the prescription and implementation of DVT prophylaxis in general surgical patients?
Quality improvement measures including increased awareness and reminders significantly improve adherence to DVT prophylaxis protocols in surgical patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports quality improvement for DVT prophylaxis adherence in surgical patients; leaves open durability and generalizability pending prospective trials.
Objective: To audit the prescription and implementation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in general surgical patients in a teaching hospital. Methods: All inpatients on three general surgical wards were audited for adequacy of prescription and implementation prophylaxis (audit A). A repeat audit 3 months later (audit B) closed the loop. The groups were compared using the chi-square test. Results: In audit A 50 patients participated. Prophylaxis was correctly prescribed in 36 (72%) and implemented in 30 (60%) patients. Eighteen patients at moderate or high risk (45%) received inadequate prophylaxis. Emergency admission, pre-operative stay and inadequate risk assignment were associated with poor implementation of protocol. In audit B 51 patients participated. Prescription was appropriate in 45 (88%) and implementation in 40 (78%) patients (p< 0.05). Eleven patients at moderate or high risk received inadequate prophylaxis. Seven of 11 high-risk patients in audit A (64%) received adequate prophylaxis, in contrast to all high-risk patients in audit B. The decision not to administer prophylaxis was deemed appropriate in 5 of 15 (30%) in audit A compared with 6 of 10 (60%) in audit B. Conclusion: Increased awareness, adequate risk assessment, updating of protocols and consistent reminders to staff and patients may improve implementation of DVT prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agu et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: