Why the study?
Does intravenous enalaprilat infusion alter sympathetic activity and metabolism in exercising muscles of normal rabbits?
Does intravenous enalaprilat infusion alter sympathetic activity and metabolism in exercising muscles of normal rabbits?
Acute ACE inhibition with enalaprilat improves oxygen utilization and suppresses local sympathetic activation in exercising muscle in normal rabbits.
Does not support clinical use in exercising humans; leaves open translation of ACE inhibition effects on muscle sympathetic activity and oxygen utilization.
To investigate the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEI) on exercise performance, the following were measured in eight normal rabbits performing graded treadmill exercise during intravenous vehicle saline or enalaprilat infusion: haemodynamics, noradrenaline (NA) spillover, hindlimb oxygen consumption and lactate release. 2. Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), femoral blood flow (FBF), hindlimb lactate release, hindlimb oxygen consumption and hindlimb NA spillover rate were all significantly increased during exercise and the changes during enalaprilat infusion were similar to control responses. 3. At submaximal exercise (6 m/min), ACEI did not significantly alter the responses of hindlimb lactate release, NA spillover rate or oxygen consumption. At the higher exercise load (12 m/min), ACEI reduced hindlimb NA spillover rate (33.1 +/- 4.2 vs 61.3 +/- 17.1 ng/min) and significantly increased oxygen consumption (241 +/- 53.4 vs 133 +/- 23.3%, P < 0.05). The ratio of hindlimb NA spillover rate to total NA spillover rate was markedly increased during exercise, with similar changes being observed in ACEI and control experiments. 4. This study indicates that acute ACEI has a favourable effect on oxygen utilization in exercising muscle in the normal rabbit. Suppression of local sympathetic activation during exercising stress, as reflected in a reduced NA spillover response, may benefit the microcirculation in exercising muscles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: