Why the study?
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately and reproducibly measure cardiac stroke volume during exercise compared to thermodilution in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately and reproducibly measure cardiac stroke volume during exercise compared to thermodilution in patients with severe coronary artery disease?
Doppler echocardiography is a reproducible and suitable non-invasive alternative to thermodilution for detecting changes in stroke volume during low-load exercise in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports Doppler echocardiography as reproducible for exercise stroke volume in severe CAD; leaves open prospective validation before wider adoption.
Cardiac stroke volume was measured simultaneously by Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution in patients with severe coronary artery disease. One group (20 patients) was examined during supine exercise at 25 W and a second group (20 patients) during sitting exercise at 25 W and 50 W. In a third group (10 patients) the reproducibility of the non-invasive stroke volume estimate was determined during upright exercise. There was a considerable variation between results obtained with the invasive and non-invasive technique at rest and during exercise, but no systematic differences were found. Analysis of variance showed that no systematic differences between ultrasonic results were introduced by two observers or by measurements on different days. The coefficient of variation between any pairs of Doppler measurements in each patient was 6%. These findings demonstrate that the ultrasonic technique is suitable for detecting changes in stroke volume induced by low load exercise in patients with severe angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ihlen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: