Key result
Impedance cardiography correlates best with stroke volume, outperforming M-mode echocardiography with an r of ~0.89.
Why the study?
The comparative performance and validity of four noninvasive techniques for measuring cardiac stroke volume under induced hemodynamic variations were evaluated.
These noninvasive methods may refine stroke volume estimates; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
This study compared cardiac stroke volumes using four noninvasive techniques in healthy volunteers: dual-beam Doppler echoaortography, electrical impedance cardiography, mechanosphygmography and M mode echocardiography of the left ventricle. Variations in stroke volume were induced by intravenous atropine in increasing doses and venous tourniquets in the absence and presence of propranolol. Biometrical analysis used correlations and principal components in order to find the common reality, reflected by the four techniques. Three of the four techniques showed good correlations between themselves as well as to the principal component. The correlation closest to the principal component was the electrical impedance cardiography (0.89) followed by the Doppler method (0.87) and the mechanosphygmography (0.84); the results from left ventricular echocardiography (0.66) were poorest. These results can be interpreted in the sense that the first three techniques are of good validity in the noninvasive assessment of stroke volume in man, and the selection of one of these techniques for use in a clinical study should depend on the study’s design and scope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breithaupt et al. (2017) studied Healthy volunteers. Electrical impedance cardiography, dual-beam Doppler echoaortography, and mechanosphygmography vs. M-mode echocardiography of the left ventricle was evaluated on Correlation of noninvasive stroke volume measurements with the principal component. Electrical impedance cardiography (r=0.89), Doppler echoaortography (r=0.87), and mechanosphygmography (r=0.84) correlated better with principal component stroke volume than M-mode echo (r=0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: