Why the study?
Skin blood flux and eccrine sweating are tightly coupled in humans, and the study was designed to separate these two sympathetic nervous system end-organ responses.
Do mechanical decreases in skin blood flux reduce thermal- and agonist-induced eccrine sweating in humans?
Do mechanical decreases in skin blood flux reduce thermal- and agonist-induced eccrine sweating in humans?
Acute decreases in skin blood flux do not proportionally decrease eccrine sweating, indicating preservation of evaporative cooling during changes in posture or blood flow restriction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sweat rate resilience to acute skin blood flow drops supports preserved cooling in orthostasis; leaves open prolonged ischemia effects on thermoregulation.
In humans, skin blood flux (SkBF) and eccrine sweating are tightly coupled, suggesting common neural control and regulation. This study was designed to separate these two sympathetic nervous system end-organ responses via nonadrenergic SkBF-decreasing mechanical perturbations during heightened sudomotor drive. We induced sweating physiologically via whole body heat stress using a high-density tube-lined suit ( protocol 1; 2 women, 4 men), and pharmacologically via forearm intradermal microdialysis of two steady-state doses of a cholinergic agonist, pilocarpine ( protocol 2; 4 women, 3 men). During sweating induction, we decreased SkBF via three mechanical perturbations: arm and leg dependency to engage the cutaneous venoarteriolar response (CVAR), limb venous occlusion to engage the CVAR and decrease perfusion pressure, and limb arterial occlusion to cause ischemia. In protocol 1, heat stress increased arm cutaneous vascular conductance and forearm sweat rate (capacitance hygrometry). During heat stress, despite decreases in SkBF during each of the acute (3 min) mechanical perturbations, eccrine sweat rate was unaffected. During heat stress with extended (10 min) ischemia, sweat rate decreased. In protocol 2, both pilocarpine doses (ED 50 and E MAX ) increased SkBF and sweat rate. Each mechanical perturbation resulted in decreased SkBF but minimal changes in eccrine sweat rate. Taken together, these data indicate that a wide range of acute decreases in SkBF do not appear to proportionally decrease either physiologically- or pharmacologically induced eccrine sweating in peripheral skin. This preservation of evaporative cooling despite acutely decreased SkBF could have consequential impacts for heat storage and balance during changes in body posture, limb position, or blood flow restrictive conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metzler‐Wilson et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: