Why the study?
Complex animals build specialised muscle to match biomechanical and energetic needs, but mechanisms coordinating mitochondria with sarcomere morphogenesis remain elusive.
Demonstrates a biomechanical feedback mechanism downstream of spalt that synchronizes mitochondria with myofibril morphogenesis in Drosophila muscles.
Mitochondrial fusion shapes muscle architecture in Drosophila; extends morphogenetic models but leaves open relevance to mammalian cardiac muscle.
Complex animals build specialised muscle to match specific biomechanical and energetic needs. Hence, composition and architecture of sarcomeres as well as mitochondria are muscle type specific. However, mechanisms coordinating mitochondria with sarcomere morphogenesis are elusive. Here we use Drosophila muscles to demonstrate that myofibril and mitochondria morphogenesis are intimately linked. In flight muscles, the muscle selector spalt instructs mitochondria to intercalate between myofibrils, which in turn mechanically constrain mitochondria into elongated shapes. Conversely in cross-striated muscles, mitochondria networks surround myofibril bundles, contacting myofibrils only with thin extensions. To investigate the mechanism causing these differences, we manipulated mitochondrial dynamics and found that increased mitochondrial fusion during myofibril assembly prevents mitochondrial intercalation in flight muscles. Strikingly, this coincides with the expression of cross-striated muscle specific sarcomeric proteins. Consequently, flight muscle myofibrils convert towards a partially cross-striated architecture. Together, these data suggest a biomechanical feedback mechanism downstream of spalt synchronizing mitochondria with myofibril morphogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avellaneda et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: