Why the study?
Do volatile anaesthetics alter bradykinin and serotonin-induced coronary vasodilation after blocking nitric oxide synthase, cyclo-oxygenase, or KATP channels in isolated guinea pig hearts?
Do volatile anaesthetics alter bradykinin and serotonin-induced coronary vasodilation after blocking nitric oxide synthase, cyclo-oxygenase, or KATP channels in isolated guinea pig hearts?
Volatile anaesthetics restore endothelium-dependent vasodilation after nitric oxide synthase inhibition in isolated hearts, while blocking prostaglandin or KATP channels has no effect.
Should not yet change anaesthetic practice; hypothesis-generating for endothelial mechanisms in coronary vasoregulation.
Background and objective Volatile anaesthetic effects on altering tone after blocking nitric oxide synthase, cyclo-oxygenase-prostaglandin synthase and KATP channel pathways are controversial. We examined in isolated guinea pig hearts whether anaesthetics alter bradykinin and 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced effects on coronary flow and percentage oxygen extraction after blocking these pathways. Methods Before and during exposure to sevoflurane, halothane or isoflurane, hearts were infused with 10−13-10−8 M bradykinin, or 10−8-10−6 M 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin), with either L-NAME, indomethacin, or glibenclamide. Bradykinin or 5-hydroxytryptamine alone increased flow and decreased percentage oxygen extraction in a concentration-dependent manner; these effects were largely blocked by L-NAME (nitro-L-arginine methylester), which also decreased basal flow and increased basal percentage oxygen extraction. Results The anaesthetics restored bradykinin and 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced increases in flow or decreases in percentage oxygen extraction after inhibition by L-NAME. Indomethacin or glibenclamide alone had little effect on basal flow and percentage oxygen extraction. The anaesthetics restored bradykinin and 5-hydroxytryptamine-induced increases in flow or decreases in percentage oxygen extraction after inhibition by L-NAME. Indomethacin or glibenclamide alone had little effect on basal flow and percentage oxygen extraction. Drug-induced increases in flow and decreases in percentage oxygen extraction in the absence or presence of glibenclamide or indomethacin were not altered at either of the two concentrations of anaesthetics. Conclusions Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is not affected by blocking prostaglandin release or KATP channels in the intact heart even in the presence of an anaesthetic. However, the diminished responses to vasodilators after nitric oxide synthase inhibition is largely restored or enhanced by anaesthetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stowe et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: