This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate prescribing patterns of antipsychotic medication and factors that predict duration of use among low-income, preschool-age children. METHODS: codes were used to describe child diagnoses. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were used to determine patterns of antipsychotic medication use and factors that predicted duration of use. RESULTS: In 2012, 316 children <6 years of age started an antipsychotic medication in a southeastern state. Most were non-Hispanic White (N=202, 64%) and boys (N=231, 73%). Diagnoses included attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (N=288, 91%), neurodevelopmental disorders (N=208, 66%), anxiety and trauma-related diagnoses (N=202, 64%), and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) (N=137, 43%). The mean±SD duration of exposure to antipsychotic medication for children in the cohort was 2.6±1.7 years, but 86 children (27%) had >4 years of exposure. Almost one-third (N=97, 31%) received polypharmacy of four or more medication classes, and 42% (N=131) received metabolic screening. Being male, being in foster care, and having a diagnosis of ASD or disruptive mood dysregulation disorder were significantly associated with duration of use of antipsychotic medications; race-ethnicity was not significantly associated with duration of use. Emergency department visits (N=277, 88%) and inpatient hospitalizations (N=107, 34%) were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Many preschoolers received antipsychotic medications for substantial periods. Further research is needed to identify evidence-based practices to reduce medication use and improve outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lohr et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: