Why the study?
Pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery for foetal spina bifida need advanced haemodynamic monitoring, prompting comparison of non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution.
Does non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring accurately measure cardiac output compared to transpulmonary thermodilution in pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery?
Does non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring accurately measure cardiac output compared to transpulmonary thermodilution in pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery?
Non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring consistently underestimates cardiac output and shows weak correlation with transpulmonary thermodilution, making it unsuitable as an alternative in pregnant patients undergoing foetoscopic surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-invasive monitoring warrants caution in pregnant foetoscopic surgery patients; this Level 3 cohort study leaves open its reliability versus thermodilution.
Pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery for foetal spina bifida have a need to be subjected to advanced haemodynamic monitoring. This observational study compares cardiac output as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring with the results of non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring. Transpulmonary thermodilution-based pulse contour analysis was performed for usual anaesthetic care, while non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring data were additionally recorded. Thirty-five patients were enrolled, resulting in 199 measurement time points. Cardiac output measurements of the non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring showed a weak correlation with the corresponding thermodilution measurements (correlation coefficient: 0.44, R 2 : 0.19; non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output: 7.4 [6.2–8.1]; thermodilution cardiac output: 8.9 [7.8–9.8]; p ≤ 0.001), while cardiac index experienced no such correlation. Furthermore, neither stroke volume nor stroke volume index correlated with the corresponding thermodilution-based data. Even though non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring consistently underestimated the corresponding thermodilution parameters, no trend analysis was achievable. Summarizing, we cannot suggest the use of non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output monitoring as an alternative to transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac output monitoring in pregnant patients undergoing minimally-invasive foetoscopic surgery for spina bifida.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneck et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: