Why the study?
Does deep anaesthesia compared to normal anaesthesia reduce the effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to attenuate Surgical Stress Index responses to intubation in ASA 1-2 patients?
Does deep anaesthesia compared to normal anaesthesia reduce the effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to attenuate Surgical Stress Index responses to intubation in ASA 1-2 patients?
Deep anaesthesia significantly reduces the effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to attenuate Surgical Stress Index responses to tracheal intubation compared to normal anaesthesia.
Surgical Stress Index has been proposed for assessment of surgical stress and analgesia. It is a numeric index based on the normalised pulse beat interval and photoplethysmographic pulse wave amplitude. We determined the effect-site concentration of remifentanil for attenuation of Surgical Stress Index responses to intubation of the trachea. Thirty ASA 1-2 patients received either deep or normal anaesthesia and then target-controlled remifentanil. Burst suppression was maintained in the deep group and state entropy at 40-60 (scale 0-91) in the normal group. Mean (SD) effect-site concentrations of remifentanil attenuating responses in 50% of patients were 2.13 (0.25) ng x ml(-1) and 3.05 (0.27) ng x ml(-1) in deep and normal groups, respectively (p = 0.034). From probit analysis, EC(50) and EC(95) of remifentanil (95% CI) were 2.34 (1.97-2.71) ng x ml(-1) and 3.19 (2.69-3.69) ng x ml(-1) in deep group and 3.17 (2.67-3.67) ng x ml(-1) and 3.79 (3.21-4.37) ng x ml(-1) in the normal group, respectively. The values from probit analysis and up-and-down method did not differ significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustola et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: