Why the study?
Does a propofol-based anesthetic reduce time to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing CABG surgery compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic?
Does a propofol-based anesthetic reduce time to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing CABG surgery compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic?
A propofol-based anesthetic significantly reduces time to extubation after CABG surgery compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic, without increasing adverse hemodynamic or ischemic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facilitates earlier extubation after CABG without delaying ICU discharge; extends evidence favoring propofol-based anesthesia in cardiac surgery.
Recent interest in earlier tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has focused attention on the potential benefits of a propofol-based technique. We randomized 124 patients (34 with poor ventricular function) undergoing CABG surgery to receive either a propofol-based (5 mg.kg-1.h-1 prior to sternotomy, 3 mg.kg-1. h-1 thereafter; n = 58) or enflurane-based (0.2%-1.0%, n = 66) anesthetic. Induction of anesthesia consisted of fentanyl 15 micrograms/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously in both groups. The enflurane group received an additional bolus of fentanyl 5 micrograms/kg prior to sternotomy and fentanyl 10 micrograms/kg with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg at commencement of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients receiving propofol were extubated earlier (median 9.1 h versus 12.3 h, P = 0.006), although there was no difference in time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (both 22 h, P = 0.54). Both groups had similar hemodynamic changes throughout (all P > 0.10), as well as metaraminol (P = 0.49) and inotrope requirements (P > 0.10), intraoperative myocardial ischemia (P = 0.12) and perioperative myocardial infarction (P = 0.50). The results of this trial suggest that a propofol-based anesthetic, when compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic requiring additional dosing of fentanyl and midazolam for CPB, can lead to a significant reduction in time to extubation after CABG surgery, without adverse hemodynamic effects, increased risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myles et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: