Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performances of two microwave sources used to produce fluorine atoms by dissociation of SF6for a CW hydrogen fluoride chemical laser are compared. The first device, large microwave plasma (LMP), is a slow-wave structure while, the other (surfatron) excites a plasma surface wave. Their performances, as far as electrical and chemical efficiencies are concerned, are quite similar when operated at the same microwave power level. However, the slow-wave structure can sustain higher microwave power, providing larger laser output power, while the surfatron has much smaller dimensions, allowing for a more compact laser system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertrand et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: