Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) orientation (vertical versus horizontal) and haptic design (1-piece versus 3-piece) on centration and tilt using a Purkinje meter. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Randomized pilot study with intrapatient comparison. METHODS: In part 1 of this study, patients received plate-haptic IOLs (Akreos Adapt) in both eyes that were positioned vertically in 1 eye and horizontally in the other eye. In part 2, patients received a 1-piece IOL (Acrysof SA60AT) in 1 eye and a 3-piece IOL (Acrysof MA60AC) in the contralateral eye. Decentration and tilt were measured 1 month and 3 months postoperatively with a new Purkinje meter. RESULTS: In part 1 (n = 15), the mean decentration of plate-haptic IOLs was 0.4 mm ± 0.2 (SD) with vertical orientation and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm with horizontal orientation and the mean tilt, 1.5 ± 1.1 degrees and 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees, respectively. In part 2 (n = 15), the mean decentration was 0.4 ± 0.3 mm with 1-piece IOLs and 0.6 ± 0.8 mm with 3-piece IOLs and the mean tilt, 2.2 ± 7.2 degrees and 5.3 ± 2.4 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three-piece IOLs had a greater tendency toward more decentration than 1-piece IOLs, perhaps because of slight deformation of 1 or both haptics during implantation or inaccuracies in production when the haptics are manually placed into the optic. The IOL orientation for plate-haptic IOLs appeared to have no effect on IOL position. The Purkinje meter was useful in assessing the capsule bag performance of the IOLs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Črnej et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: