Key result
Pulse pressure variation showed higher diagnostic accuracy for volume responsiveness than inferior vena cava dispensability index, achieving an AUC of 0.93 at a tidal volume of 12 mL/kg.
Why the study?
The study investigated the effects of tidal volume on the diagnostic value of pulse pressure variation and the inferior vena cava dispensability index for volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation.
Does pulse pressure variation or inferior vena cava dispensability index better predict volume responsiveness at different tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients?
Observational (n=79)
Does pulse pressure variation or inferior vena cava dispensability index better predict volume responsiveness at different tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.93
Pulse pressure variation is more accurate than the inferior vena cava dispensability index for predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients, and its accuracy increases with higher tidal volumes.
PPV may outperform IVC dispensability index for volume responsiveness in ventilated patients; hypothesis-generating pending randomized validation across tidal volumes.
This study investigated the effects of tidal volume (TV) on the diagnostic value of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and the inferior vena cava dispensability index (IVC-DI) for volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. In patients undergoing elective surgery with mechanical ventilation, different TVs of 6, 9, and 12 mL/kg were given for two min. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (VTI) was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. The IVC-DI was measured at sub-xyphoid transabdominal long axis. The PPV was measured via the radial artery and served as baseline. Index measurements were repeated after fluid challenge. VTI increased by more than 15% after fluid challenge, which was considered as volume responsive. Seventy-nine patients were enrolled, 38 of whom were considered positive volume responsive. Baseline data between the response group and the non-response group were similar. Receiver operating characteristic curve confirmed PPV accuracy in diagnosing an increase in volume responsiveness with increased TV. When TV was 12 mL/kg, the PPV area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 and the threshold value was 15.5%. IVC-DI had the highest diagnostic accuracy at a TV of 9 mL/kg and an AUC of 0.79, with a threshold value of 15.3%. When TV increased to 12 mL/kg, the IVC-DI value decreased. When the TV was 9 and 12 mL/kg, PPV showed improved performance in diagnosing volume responsiveness than did IVC-DI. PPV diagnostic accuracy in mechanically ventilated patients was higher than IVC-DI. PPV accuracy in predicting volume responsiveness was increased by increasing TV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Elective surgery with mechanical ventilation (n=79). Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and inferior vena cava dispensability index (IVC-DI) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for volume responsiveness (VTI increase >15% after fluid challenge) (AUC 0.93). Pulse pressure variation showed higher diagnostic accuracy for volume responsiveness than inferior vena cava dispensability index, achieving an AUC of 0.93 at a tidal volume of 12 mL/kg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: