Key result
Simultaneous (kissing) balloon angioplasty significantly reduced the rate of permanent or transient side-branch compromise compared to sequential angioplasty (0% vs 33%; P=0.003).
Why the study?
Does simultaneous balloon angioplasty (kissing balloon technique) improve immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic results compared to sequential balloon angioplasty in patients with symptomatic bifurcation coronary lesions?
Population
59 patients with symptomatic bifurcation coronary lesions type III
Comparison
Simultaneous balloon angioplasty with mandatory… vs Sequential balloon angioplasty with mandatory…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6-month
Authors
Loading...
Kissing balloons may limit side-branch compromise in bifurcation PCI; leaves open clinical benefit and requires randomized confirmation.
Cohort (n=59)
Does simultaneous balloon angioplasty (kissing balloon technique) improve immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic results compared to sequential balloon angioplasty in patients with symptomatic bifurcation coronary lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 33%
p-value: p=0.003
Kissing balloon angioplasty reduces the rate of transient side-branch occlusion compared to sequential angioplasty but does not improve immediate or long-term clinical outcomes for stenting of bifurcation lesions.
Brueck et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic bifurcation coronary lesions type III (n=59). Simultaneous balloon angioplasty (kissing balloon technique) vs. Sequential balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Permanent or transient side-branch compromise rate (TIMI flow < 3) (p=0.003). Simultaneous (kissing) balloon angioplasty significantly reduced the rate of permanent or transient side-branch compromise compared to sequential angioplasty (0% vs 33%; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: