Key result
Kissing balloon inflation shows no benefit over no inflation for long-term MACE in provisional stenting.
Why the study?
Data regarding the long-term clinical efficacy of kissing balloon inflation after provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions are lacking.
Does kissing balloon inflation improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing provisional stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions?
Observational (n=873)
Yes
Does kissing balloon inflation improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing provisional stenting for coronary bifurcation lesions?
Hazard Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.65–1.65)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.1% vs 15.8%
p-value: p=0.95
In a real-world multicenter registry, kissing balloon inflation did not improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with provisional stenting.
KBI after provisional stenting shows no long-term MACE benefit; leaves open routine use and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of data regarding the long-term clinical efficacy of the kissing balloon inflation (KBI) after provisional stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of KBI on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing provisional stenting for the coronary bifurcation lesions in a large real-world population. METHODS: A total of 873 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with provisional stenting and had clinical follow up were analyzed. Patients treated with 2-stent strategy were excluded. To reduce the effect of potential confounding factors in this observational study, propensity score matching was conducted. RESULTS: KBI was performed in 325 patients (37.2%). The median follow-up duration was 37.3 months. Patients treated with KBI more often had a previous PCI (48.6% vs. 42.5% SMD = 0.123). Patients in non-kissing group had more complex coronary disease with higher prevalence of calcification (14.8% vs. 21.4% SMD = 0.172), thrombosis (2.8% vs. 5.8% SMD = 0.152) and longer side branch lesions (8.3% vs. 11.7% SMD = 0.113). There were no significant differences in the major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization after KBI versus no KBI (15.4% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.28), in total cohort or in matched patients (17.1% vs. 15.8%, adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.65, p = 0.95). The lack of effect of KBI on clinical outcomes was consistent across various subgroups including left main disease. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter real-world registry, KBI did not improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with provisional stenting technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khelimskii et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary bifurcation lesions (n=873). Kissing balloon inflation vs. No kissing balloon inflation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.65, p=0.95). Kissing balloon inflation did not improve long-term major adverse cardiac events compared to no inflation in patients undergoing provisional stenting (adjusted HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.65-1.65; p=0.95).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: