Key result
Final kissing ballooning after main vessel stenting for bifurcation lesions was associated with a higher risk of MACE compared to main vessel stenting alone (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.52-4.37; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does final kissing ballooning reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing PCI for non-left main bifurcation lesions with the 1-stent technique?
Cohort (n=1,065)
Yes
Does final kissing ballooning reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing PCI for non-left main bifurcation lesions with the 1-stent technique?
Hazard Ratio: 2.58 (95% CI 1.52–4.37)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients treated with the 1-stent technique for non-left main bifurcation lesions, final kissing ballooning is associated with increased rates of MACE and target lesion revascularization.
Caution against routine final kissing ballooning in 1-stent non-LM bifurcation PCI; leaves open whether RCTs will confirm harm or identify benefiting subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Whether final kissing ballooning (FKB) is mandatory in the 1-stent technique is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of FKB on long-term clinical outcomes in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the 1-stent technique. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents for non-left main bifurcation lesions were enrolled from 16 centres in Korea between January 2004 and June 2006. In patients treated with the 1-stent technique major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularisation (TLR)) were compared between those undergoing main vessel stenting only (non-FKB group, n=736) or those undergoing FKB after main vessel stenting (FKB group, n=329). Propensity score-matching analysis was also performed in 222 patient pairs (444 from the non-FKB group and 222 from the FKB group). RESULTS: During follow-up (median 22 months), the FKB group had a higher incidence of MACE (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.52 to 4.37; p<0.001) and TLR (HR 3.63; 95% CI 2.00 to 6.56; p<0.001), but not of cardiac death or MI. Most TLR occurred in the main vessel (HR 3.39 for the FKB group; 95% CI 1.86 to 6.19; p<0.001). The rate of stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (0.5% in the non-FKB group vs 0.6% in the FKB group, p=0.99). After propensity score matching, the FKB group still had higher rates of MACE and TLR than the non-FKB group (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.15 to 3.95; p=0.02 and HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.45 to 5.55; p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with the 1-stent technique for bifurcation lesions, FKB after main vessel stenting may be harmful mainly due to increased TLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00851526.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwon et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Coronary bifurcation lesions (n=1,065). Final kissing ballooning (FKB) vs. Main vessel stenting only (non-FKB) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation) (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.52-4.37, p=<0.001). Final kissing ballooning after main vessel stenting for bifurcation lesions was associated with a higher risk of MACE compared to main vessel stenting alone (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.52-4.37; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: