Why the study?
Does acute blood loss cause worse survival and metabolic outcomes in spontaneously hypertensive rats compared to normotensive rats?
Does acute blood loss cause worse survival and metabolic outcomes in spontaneously hypertensive rats compared to normotensive rats?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spontaneous hypertension in rats is associated with impaired metabolic response and reduced survival following acute hemorrhage, suggesting hypertension is a risk factor during severe blood loss.
In order to evaluate experimentally if the presence of hypertensive disease is an additional risk factor in connection with emergency situations including blood loss, awake spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) were subjected to standardized acute haemorrhage (35% of blood volume) via an aortic catheter. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), blood gases, acid-base balance, blood glucose and haematocrit values were followed and the 5-h survival rate was determined. In the early posthaemorrhagic phase similar plasma refill, as evidenced from haematocrit readings, was seen in SHR and WKY. Hyperglycaemia occurred in both groups but the hyperglycaemic response was only moderate and transient in SHR. The inability of SHR to maintain hyperglycaemia was intimately correlated to early appearance of metabolic acidosis and short posthaemorrhagic survival times. Determination of liver glycogen content of unbled SHR and WKY indicated that the deficient hyperglycaemic response in SHR was not due to inadequate glycogen stores but rather to poor liver perfusion resulting in liver hypoxia. Since spontaneous hypertension in rats in many ways is considered to be similar to essential hypertension in man, these findings suggest that human hypertensive disease constitutes a considerable risk factor in connection with acute haemorrhage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wennberg et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: