In eNOS knockout mice, nNOS-cGMP-dependent pathways provide a compensatory mechanism for acetylcholine-induced dilation of pial arterioles.
nNOS-cGMP pathways may compensate for eNOS loss in murine pial arterioles; hypothesis-generating and should not yet inform practice.
We evaluated the effects of superfusing 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), eNOS null (B) an inhibitor of soluble guanylyl cyclase, and 7-nitroindazole sodium (7-NI), a selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor, on the acetylcholine (ACh) response in endothelial NOS (eNOS) null mice. Pial arteriolar diameter was measured by intravital microscopy through a closed cranial window under alpha-chloralose anesthesia. NOS activity was measured by [3H]arginine-to-[3H]citrulline conversion in subjacent cortex in vitro. The density and distribution of muscarinic receptors in the brain were determined by quantitative [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate autoradiography and did not differ between the eNOS mutants and wild-type mice. ACh superfusion (1 and 10 microM) dose dependently dilated pial arterioles in eNOS null and wild-type mice. ODQ (10 microM) attenuated ACh-induced dilation in both eNOS mutants (41% decrease at 10 microM ACh, P < 0.01, n = 6) and wild-type strains (n = 5 per group). By contrast, topical superfusion of 7-NI (100 microM) attenuated the ACh response in eNOS mutants only (66%, P < 0.05, and 25% decrease, P < 0.05, at 1 and 10 microM ACh, respectively). Our findings suggest that nNOS-guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent pathways dilate pial arterioles by compensatory mechanisms after eNOS gene disruption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayata et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: