Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The InSb(100) surface was grown using the techniques of molecular-beam expitaxy. The surface was found to undergo several surface reconstructions, including a c(4×{}4), a c(8×{}2), an asymmetric (1×{}3), a symmetric (1×{}3), and a (1×{}1). High-resolution photoemission spectra of the In and Sb 4d core levels clearly exhibited surface-shifted components for some of these reconstructed surfaces. Analyses of the In and Sb core-level photoemission intensities as well as of the surface to bulk intensity ratios for the c(4×{}4) and c(8×{}2) structures were carried out. The c(4×{}4) surface was found to be terminated with 1--(3/4 monolayers of Sb, while (3/4 monolayer of In was found to be the termination of the c(8×{}2) surface. Structural models are proposed for the c(8×{}2) and c(4×{}4) based upon these coverages and upon existing models of the similar GaAs(100) structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: