Why the study?
Are hemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses to mental arithmetic and handgrip exercise reproducible in normotensive and hypertensive subjects?
Are hemodynamic and plasma catecholamine responses to mental arithmetic and handgrip exercise reproducible in normotensive and hypertensive subjects?
Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to mental arithmetic and handgrip exercise show considerable intra-individual variability, which must be accounted for when interpreting sympathoadrenal reactivity in cardiovascular studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intra-individual BP response variability warrants caution in single-test sympathoadrenal interpretations; leaves open optimal reproducibility protocols for future studies.
To determine the reproducibility of a mental arithmetic stress test and a handgrip exercise test, we studied the responses of blood pressure, heart rate, forearm blood flow and plasma catecholamines on two occasions, with an interval of at least 1 week, in 24 normotensive and 22 hypertensive subjects. 2. The SE of a single observation of the percentage changes of blood pressure ranged from 3.9 to 9.3% in normotensive subjects and from 3.9 to 7.4% in hypertensive subjects in both tests. For heart rate, these values were 4.9-12.3% in the normotensive subjects and 4.8-5.7% in the hypertensive subjects. However, there was a wide individual scatter of these haemodynamic responses during both tests. The forearm blood flow, only measured during mental arithmetic, had an SE of a single observation of 33.7%. 3. In 10 normotensive subjects the SE of a single observation of the change in plasma noradrenaline was 0.16 nmol/l during handgrip exercise and 0.09 nmol/l during mental arithmetic. The corresponding values for plasma adrenaline were 0.04 and 0.05 nmol/l. 4. In conclusion, although both tests showed a rather low SE of a single observation for the blood pressure and heart rate responses in normo- and hyper-tensive subjects, there was a considerable individual variability. If related to the mean forearm blood flow responses, the SE of a single observation of the forearm blood flow response was of similar magnitude. The limited intra-individual reproducibility of both tests should be borne in mind when interpreting pharmacological intervention studies or studies evaluating sympathoadrenal reactivity in cardiovascular disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenders et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: