Key result
The first year of follow-up after a first TIA was associated with improved concomitant risk-factor control from 20% to 33% (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.38-3.13), which then stagnated in years 2-5.
Why the study?
Long-term risk-factor control and secondary prevention are not well characterized in patients following a first TIA.
Are long-term risk-factor control and secondary prevention treatments adequately maintained up to 5 years after a first TIA?
Cohort (n=942)
Are long-term risk-factor control and secondary prevention treatments adequately maintained up to 5 years after a first TIA?
Risk-factor control and secondary prevention treatment after a first TIA improve initially but stagnate or decline over 5 years, highlighting a need for sustained secondary prevention efforts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights a critical gap in long-term secondary prevention adherence after TIA; leaves open.
INTRODUCTION: Long-term risk-factor control and secondary prevention are not well characterized in patients with a first transient ischemic attack (TIA). With baseline levels as reference, we compared primary-care data on blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), smoking, and use of antihypertensives, statins and antiplatelet treatment/oral anticoagulation (APT/OAC) during 5 years after a first TIA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in QregPV, a Swedish primary-care register for the Region of Västra Götaland, with a first TIA discharge diagnosis from wards proficient in stroke care 2010 to 2012 were identified and followed up to 5 years. BP, LDL-C, smoking, use of antihypertensives, statins, APT/OAC, and achievement of target levels were calculated. We used logistic mixed-effect models to analyze the effect of follow-up over time on risk-factor control and secondary prevention treatment. RESULTS: We identified 942 patients without prior cerebrovascular disease who had a first TIA. Compared to baseline, the first year of follow-up was associated with improvements in concomitant attainment of BP <140/90 mmHg, LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L and non-smoking, which rose from 20% to 33% (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.38-3.13), but then stagnated in years 2-5. In the first year of follow-up, 47% of patients had complete secondary prevention treatment (antihypertensives, APT/OAC and statin), but continued follow-up was associated with a yearly decrease in secondary prevention treatment (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.94-0.98). CONCLUSION: Risk-factor control was inadequate, leaving considerable potential for improved secondary prevention treatment after a first TIA in Swedish patients followed up to 5 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bager et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in first transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=942). First year of follow-up vs. Baseline was evaluated on concomitant attainment of BP <140/90 mmHg, LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L and non-smoking (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.38-3.13). The first year of follow-up after a first TIA was associated with improved concomitant risk-factor control from 20% to 33% (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.38-3.13), which then stagnated in years 2-5.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: