Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Excessive postoperative adhesion formation is a major result of surgery. The adhesion reduction effects of a chitosan membrane and poloxamer gel barrier were measured in a rat peritoneal model. Forty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups (control, poloxamer, chitosan, and poloxamer+chitosan sandwich). Two cm2 of cecal serosa and the adjacent abdominal wall were abraded. The denuded cecum was covered with either a chitosan membrane, a poloxamer gel, chitosan in a sandwich configuration with poloxamer on both sides, or neither (control group) and apposed to the abdominal wall. Fourteen days after surgery adhesions were graded using a whole-number scoring system of zero to five. Adhesion strength was determined using a whole-number system of one to four. Adhesion area was measured on a continuous scale of adhesion severity. Adhesion grades were highest in the control group (5.00 +/- 0.00) and were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the poloxamer group (3.50 +/- 1.35), the chitosan group (1.64 +/- 1.63), and the poloxamer+chitosan group (1.18 +/- 1.25). The two chitosan-containing groups also had significantly (P < 0.05) reduced adhesion grades in comparison with the poloxamer group. Adhesion area in both chitosan-containing groups was reduced in comparison with control and adhesion strength was reduced significantly (P < 0.05) in all groups compared with control. The poloxamer+chitosan group had significantly (P < 0.05) reduced adhesion strength versus poloxamer only. There was a significant (P < 0.05) linear correlation (r = 0.931, P < 0.001) between adhesion grade and adhesion strength. We conclude that chitosan and the combination of poloxamer+chitosan were shown to effectively reduce adhesion area, grade, and strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlahos et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: