Key result
A modified LRCN deep learning model using single-channel PPG signals estimated SBP, DBP, and HR with mean absolute errors of 2.942 mmHg, 1.747 mmHg, and 1.137 bpm, respectively.
Why the study?
Does a modified LRCN deep learning model using PPG signals accurately estimate SBP, DBP, and HR in ICU patients?
Does a modified LRCN deep learning model using PPG signals accurately estimate SBP, DBP, and HR in ICU patients?
A modified LRCN deep learning model using single-channel PPG signals can accurately and simultaneously estimate SBP, DBP, and HR, meeting British Hypertension Society Grade A standards.
In this study, single-channel photoplethysmography (PPG) signals were used to estimate the heart rate (HR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). A deep learning model was proposed using a long-term recurrent convolutional network (LRCN) modified from a deep learning algorithm, the convolutional neural network model of the modified inception deep learning module, and a long short-term memory network (LSTM) to improve the model's accuracy of BP and HR measurements. The PPG data of 1,551 patients were obtained from the University of California Irvine Machine Learning Repository. How to design a filter of PPG signals and how to choose the loss functions for deep learning model were also discussed in the study. Finally, the stability of the proposed model was tested using a 10-fold cross-validation, with an MAE ± SD of 2.942 ± 5.076 mmHg for SBP, 1.747 ± 3.042 mmHg for DBP, and 1.137 ± 2.463 bpm for the HR. Compared with its existing counterparts, the model entailed less computational load and was more accurate in estimating SBP, DBP, and HR. These results established the validity of the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostafa et al. (2021) studied this question. Modified long-term recurrent convolutional network (LRCN) vs. Existing counterparts was evaluated on Accuracy of BP and HR measurements (Mean Absolute Error). A modified LRCN deep learning model using single-channel PPG signals estimated SBP, DBP, and HR with mean absolute errors of 2.942 mmHg, 1.747 mmHg, and 1.137 bpm, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: