Why the study?
Does valsartan added to conventional therapy improve efficacy and safety in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction <40%?
Does valsartan added to conventional therapy improve efficacy and safety in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction <40%?
The Val-HeFT trial enrolled a representative population of mild to moderate heart failure patients to evaluate the addition of valsartan to conventional therapy.
Supports broad applicability of Val-HeFT results to typical mild-moderate HFrEF patients; extends evidence for valsartan addition in industrialized settings.
BACKGROUND: The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) is the first large-scale randomized, multinational clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, added to conventional therapy, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, in heart failure patients. A total of 5010 patients with an ejection fraction <40% have been randomized to either valsartan titrated to 160 mg b.i.d. or to placebo. AIMS: Baseline characteristics of patients in Val-HeFT are presented and compared with other major clinical trials in heart failure. METHODS: Baseline data were collected and summary statistics calculated. RESULTS: The study population has a mean age of 62.7 years and is 80% male, 90.3% white, 6.9% black, and 2.8% Asian. Antecedent coronary heart disease is reported in 57.2% of patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are prescribed for 92.7% of patients, diuretics for 85.8%, digoxin for 67.3%, and beta-blockers for 35.6%. Subgroup comparisons by age, sex, race and ejection fraction quartile show small differences in baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: Overall the Val-HeFT population is generally representative of the population of patients with mild to moderate heart failure in industrialized countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohn et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: