Key result
CDCs outperform other cell types in improving post-MI cardiac function and engraftment in mice.
Why the study?
Do cardiosphere-derived cells provide superior myocardial repair compared to other stem cell types in a mouse model of myocardial infarction?
Population
Mouse model of myocardial infarction (in vivo) and human/rat stem cells (in vitro)
Comparison
Cardiosphere-derived stem cells (CDCs) vs Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells…
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
3 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Cardiosphere-derived cells demonstrate superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy compared to other adult stem cell types in experimental myocardial infarction.
Do cardiosphere-derived cells provide superior myocardial repair compared to other stem cell types in a mouse model of myocardial infarction?
Cardiosphere-derived cells demonstrate superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy compared to other adult stem cell types in experimental myocardial infarction.
Li et al. (2012) studied Myocardial infarction. Cardiosphere-derived stem cells (CDCs) vs. BM-MSCs, AD-MSCs, and BM-MNCs was evaluated on Improvement of cardiac function and cell engraftment. Cardiosphere-derived cells provided superior improvement of cardiac function, highest cell engraftment, and greatest myogenic differentiation compared to other stem cell types in a mouse model of MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: