Why the study?
Does surgery using the USCI intraluminal prosthesis improve survival in patients with acute ascending aortic dissection?
Does surgery using the USCI intraluminal prosthesis improve survival in patients with acute ascending aortic dissection?
The use of an intraluminal prosthesis for acute ascending aortic dissection yielded high survival and symptom-free rates in a small case series.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of intraluminal prosthesis in acute aortic dissection; leaves open comparative efficacy in controlled trials.
Ten consecutive cases of acute ascending aortic dissection operated on using the USCI intraluminal prosthesis from 1983 to 1986 were reviewed. Diagnosis was achieved by conventional angiography in six cases, by intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in one case, by computerized tomography (CT) scan in two cases and by echocardiography and abdominal ultrasound in one case. An entry site was seen in only five out of six conventional angiograms. At operation six of the 10 had a degree of tamponade. Aortic regurgitation was seen five times, due to dissection in four cases and to Marfan's disease in one. The entry site was controlled in eight cases. Repair using intraluminal prosthesis only was achieved in five cases. Aortic valve repair was added in four out of 10 cases, and in one of these an aorta-to-right coronary graft was also added. One case required aortic valve replacement. A method of aortic valve repair is presented. There were nine survivors, 1-36 months postoperatively. Of these, eight were asymptomatic on no medication. One had severe aortic regurgitation noted 2 months postoperatively and has mildly reduced exercise tolerance. Surgical treatment can be planned if the presence of dissection is proven and involvement of the ascending aorta is demonstrated. Early surgery is important, since six of the 10 cases in this series had tamponade. The intraluminal graft will reliably redirect flow to the true lumen and exclude the dissection from the pericardium. Aortic valve repair can be successful though late replacement may be necessary in some cases. Control of the entry site is not essential to achieve a good clinical result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chard et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: