Key result
Contrast echocardiography and 3DE provide more accurate assessments of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes compared to unenhanced 2DE in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Does contrast echocardiography and 3DE improve the accuracy of LVEF and LV volume measurements compared to unenhanced 2DE in heart failure patients?
Does contrast echocardiography and 3DE improve the accuracy of LVEF and LV volume measurements compared to unenhanced 2DE in heart failure patients?
Contrast and 3D echocardiography significantly improve the precision and reproducibility of LVEF and LV volume assessments in heart failure patients compared to standard unenhanced 2D echocardiography.
May enhance LVEF accuracy in HF; leaves open whether adoption improves outcomes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a powerful prognostic marker in heart failure and plays a pivotal role in the allocation of many treatments that reduce morbidity and mortality. Although unenhanced two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is the most ubiquitous tool for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) size and systolic function, it does not provide reliable, reproducible and accurate measures. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise contrast echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for the assessment of LVEF and LV volumes. RECENT FINDINGS: Contrast echocardiography results in more accurate assessment of LVEF and LV volumes than unenhanced 2DE, significantly improving correlation with cardiac magnetic resonance, with comparable reproducibility. Contrast echocardiography reduces downstream testing, frequently alters patient management, and results in substantial cost savings. 3DE shows higher levels of agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance over unenhanced 2DE for LVEF and LV volumes, but requires adequate image quality, and consistently underestimates LV volumes due to limited spatial resolution. SUMMARY: The advent of contrast 2DE and 3DE has marked the dawn of significant improvements in the precision and reproducibility of echocardiography. Contrast 3DE improves LV assessment in patients with suboptimal images, but further work is needed to demonstrate incremental benefit over contrast echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurunathan et al. (2016) conducted a review in Heart failure. Contrast echocardiography and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) vs. Unenhanced two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) was evaluated on Assessment of LVEF and LV volumes. Contrast echocardiography and 3DE provide more accurate assessments of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes compared to unenhanced 2DE in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: