Why the study?
Does local application of a 5.5 mT static magnetic field to the neck modulate blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rabbits with pharmacologically altered blood pressure?
Does local application of a 5.5 mT static magnetic field to the neck modulate blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity in conscious rabbits with pharmacologically altered blood pressure?
Local application of a 5.5 mT static magnetic field to the neck region in rabbits exerts a biphasic, restorative effect on pharmacologically altered vascular tone and blood pressure, potentially via baroreflex pathways.
No clinical role for neck magnetic fields in BP management; leaves open baroreflex effects in human hypertension trials.
Static magnetic fields (SMF) in the millitesla (mT) range have been reported to modulate microcirculatory hemodynamics and/or blood pressure (BP) under pharmacologically modified state in mammals. This study was designed to investigate the acute effects of local application of a SMF to neck or pelvic region under pharmacologically modulated BP; norepinephrine (NE)-induced hypertension as well as an L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel blocker, nicardipine (NIC)-induced hypotension in conscious rabbits. Magnetic flux densities were up to 5.5 mT and the spatial magnetic gradient peaked in neck (carotid sinus baroreceptor) region at the level of approximately 0.06 mT/mm. The duration of exposure was 30 min (including 10 min of pretreatment) and the effects on BP were investigated up to 100 min postexposure. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was estimated from invasive recordings of systolic BP and pulse interval. Neck exposure to 5.5 mT significantly attenuated the pharmacologically induced vasoconstriction or vasodilation, and subsequently suppressed the increase or decrease in BP compared with sham exposure. In contrast, pelvic exposure to 5.5 mT did not significantly antagonized NE-elevated BP or NIC-reduced BP. The neck exposure to 5.5 mT has a biphasic and restorative effect on vascular tone and BP acting to normalize the tone and BP. The neck exposure to 5.5 mT caused a significant increase in BRS in NE-elevated BP compared with sham exposure. The buffering effects of the SMF on increased hemodynamic variability under NE-induced high vascular tone and NIC-induced low vascular tone might be, in part, dependent on baroreflex pathways, which could modulate NE-mediated response in conjunction with Ca(2+) dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okano et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: