Why the study?
To determine the prevalence and in vitro electrophysiological phenotype of ultra-rare SCN5A variants of uncertain significance identified in unexplained sudden cardiac arrest survivors.
In unexplained SCA survivors, SCN5A variants of uncertain significance without a corresponding clinical phenotype exhibit wild-type electrophysiological properties in vitro, emphasizing the need to prioritize clinical phenotype over genotype.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SCN5A VUS without matching phenotype warrant no reclassification in unexplained SCA; supports prioritizing clinical features over genotype in variant assessment.
AIMS: To determine the prevalence and in vitro electrophysiological (EP) phenotype of ultra-rare SCN5A variants of uncertain significance (VUS) identified in unexplained sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective review of 73 unexplained SCA survivors was used to identify all patients that underwent a form of genetic testing that included comprehensive SCN5A analysis. Ultra-rare SCN5A variants (minor allele frequency < 0.005) were adjudicated according to the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Variants designated as VUS were expressed heterologously and characterized using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Overall, 60/73 (82%; the average age at SCA 28 ± 12 years) unexplained SCA survivors had received SCN5A genetic testing. Of these, 5/60 (8.3%) had an ultra-rare SCN5A variant. All SCN5A variants were classified as VUS. Whereas the single SCN5A VUS (p.Asp872Asn-SCN5A) identified in an unexplained SCA survivor with PR interval prolongation and inferior early repolarization conferred a loss-of-function phenotype (46.2% reduction in peak current density; 16 ms slower recovery from inactivation), the four other SCN5A VUS (p.Glu30Gly-SCN5A, p.Gln245Lys-SCN5A, p.Pro648Leu-SCN5A, and p.Glu1240Gln-SCN5A) identified in unexplained SCA survivors without early repolarization/conduction delay were indistinguishable from wild-type Nav1.5 channels. CONCLUSION: In the absence of a phenotype(s) potentially attributable to sodium channel dysfunction, all SCN5A VUS identified in unexplained SCA survivors conferred a wild-type EP phenotype in vitro. As the background rate of SCN5A genetic variation is not trivial, great care must be taken to avoid prioritizing genotype over phenotype when attempting to ascertain the root cause of an individual's SCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudicessi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: