Why the study?
Does transcatheter mitral valve repair compared to surgical mitral valve repair affect the risk of stroke, atrial fibrillation, and major bleeding in high surgical risk patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation?
Does transcatheter mitral valve repair compared to surgical mitral valve repair affect the risk of stroke, atrial fibrillation, and major bleeding in high surgical risk patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation?
The true risk of stroke, atrial fibrillation, and major bleeding after transcatheter mitral valve repair remains an area of ongoing debate despite low reported short-term stroke rates.
In recent years, edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) has emerged as an acceptable therapeutic option for inoperable or high surgical risk patients suffering from severe mitral valve regurgitation1,2,3. The main advantages of TMVR over traditional surgical approaches – hereinafter referred to as surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) – are its limited invasiveness and favourable safety profile, though clinical outcomes and functional cardiac parameters remain significantly inferior at long-term follow-up1,2. In large registries, the incidence of clinically overt stroke after TMVR is reported to be very low, ranging from 0.2% to 0.4% at discharge and from 0.7% to 0.8% at 30 days4,5,6,7. However, ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giacoppo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: