Why the study?
What are the 99th percentile upper reference limits of hsTnT and hsTnI in a cardio-renal healthy population screened by CMR?
What are the 99th percentile upper reference limits of hsTnT and hsTnI in a cardio-renal healthy population screened by CMR?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a strictly defined cardio-renal healthy population screened by CMR, the 99th percentile URLs for hsTnT and hsTnI were 15.2 and 21.2 ng/L, respectively, with significant sex differences and distinct associations with cardiac morphology and renal function.
The 99 th percentile upper reference limits (URL) of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in healthy subjects are essential for diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases. Unless screened stringently, subclinical disease affects the derived URL. In 779 healthy subjects(49% males; 17–88 years) screened by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), the gold standard for assessing cardiac volumes and myocardial mass; and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the 99 th percentile URL of hsTnT (Roche) and hs-cTnI (Abbott) were similar to the published URL. The overall 99 th percentile URL of hsTnT and hsTnI were 15.2 and 21.2 ng/L, respectively; males had higher values than females (hsTnT: 16.8 versus 11.9 ng/L and hsTnI: 38.8 versus 14.4 ng/L). Correlation between hsTnT and hsTnI was modest (r = 0.45; p < 0.001). A larger proportion of healthy volunteers <60 years had detectable hsTnI compared to hsTnT (n = 534; 30.0% versus 18.3%, p < 0.001). Lower eGFR was an independent clinical determinant of hsTnT, but not hsTnI. Both hs-cTn concentrations were independently associated with myocardial mass and cardiac volumes (p < 0.01 for all), but only hsTnI was independently associated with CMR multi-directional strain measures and extent of LV trabeculations (p < 0.05 for all). Differences exist between hs-cTn assays and may influence their selection depending on cardiac conditions, patient population and local factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aw et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: