Why the study?
Does olmesartan compared to azilsartan improve renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system parameters in patients with essential hypertension after cardiac surgery?
Does olmesartan compared to azilsartan improve renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system parameters in patients with essential hypertension after cardiac surgery?
Olmesartan appears more effective than azilsartan at reducing angiotensin II and aldosterone levels, as well as left ventricular mass index, in post-cardiac surgery patients with essential hypertension.
Favors olmesartan over azilsartan for RAAS suppression and LVMI reduction post-cardiac surgery; extends head-to-head ARB data in hypertensive patients.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been widely used to treat hypertension and large-scale clinical studies have shown various benefits. In this study, we compared olmesartan with azilsartan, the newest ARB. METHODS: The subjects were outpatients who were clinically stable after cardiac surgery. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either azilsartan or olmesartan for 1 year and were switched to the other drug for the following 1 year. The primary endpoints were the levels of plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone. RESULTS: Home blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and additional antihypertensive medication was administered to 12 patients (20 episodes) in the azilsartan group versus 4 patients (4 episodes) in the olmesartan group, with the number being significantly higher in the azilsartan group. After 1 year of treatment, both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Left ventricular mass index was also significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. CONCLUSION: This study showed that olmesartan reduces angiotensin II and aldosterone levels more effectively than azilsartan. Accordingly, it may be effective in patients with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity after cardiac surgery or patients with severe cardiac hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sezai et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: