An expanded latch-bridge model suggests thin-filament regulatory proteins tune actomyosin ATPase activity, allowing smooth muscle cells to maintain force at low energy cost or change contractile state rapidly.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model leaves clinical vascular implications open; extends latch-bridge theory in vitro but requires in vivo validation.
A thin-filament-regulated latch-bridge model of smooth muscle contraction is proposed to integrate thin-filament-based inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity with myosin phosphorylation in the regulation of smooth muscle mechanics. The model included two latch-bridge cycles, one of which was identical to the four-state model as proposed by Hai and Murphy (Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 255: C86-C94, 1988), whereas the ultraslow cross-bridge cycle has lower cross-bridge cycling rates. The model-fitted phorbol ester induced slow contractions at constant myosin phosphorylation and predicted steeper dependence of force on myosin phosphorylation in phorbol ester-stimulated smooth muscle. By shifting cross bridges between the two latch-bridge cycles, the model predicts that a smooth muscle cell can either maintain force at extremely low-energy cost or change its contractile state rapidly, if necessary. Depending on the fraction of cross bridges engaged in the ultraslow latch-bridge cycle, the model predicted biphasic kinetics of smooth muscle mechanics and variable steady-state dependencies of force and shortening velocity on myosin phosphorylation. These results suggest that thin-filament-based regulatory proteins may function as tuners of actomyosin ATPase activity, thus allowing a smooth muscle cell to have two discrete cross-bridge cycles with different cross-bridge cycling rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hai et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: