Why the study?
Does the AvoSure PT PRO portable monitor provide accurate INR measurements compared to standard laboratory methods in patients on acenocoumarol therapy?
Does the AvoSure PT PRO portable monitor provide accurate INR measurements compared to standard laboratory methods in patients on acenocoumarol therapy?
The AvoSure PT PRO portable monitor provides accurate INR measurements in capillary blood and plasma, correlating well with standard laboratory methods for monitoring oral anticoagulation.
Supports point-of-care INR testing with AvoSure PT PRO; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We evaluated a new portable monitor (AvoSure PT PRO, Menarini Diagnostics, Firenze, Italy) developed to test the prothrombin time in capillary blood and plasma by comparing it with the standard laboratory determination. We studied 62 patients receiving acenocoumarol therapy. The international normalized ratio (INR) in capillary blood was analyzed by 2 methods: AvoSure PT PRO and Thrombotrack Nycomed Analyzer (Axis-Shield, Dundee, Scotland). Parallel studies were performed in plasma samples by a reference method using the Behring Coagulation Timer (Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Plasma samples also were tested with the AvoSure PT PRO. Correlation was good for INR values for capillary blood and plasma samples by AvoSure PT PRO and our reference method (R2 = 0.8596) and for capillary blood samples tested by the AvoSure PT PRO and Thrombotrack Nycomed Analyzer (R2 = 0.8875). The correlation for INR in capillary blood and plasma samples by AvoSure PT PRO was 0.6939 (P < .0004). Capillary blood determinations are rapid and effective for monitoring oral anticoagulation therapy and have a high correlation to plasma determinations. AvoSure PT PRO is accurate for controlling INR in plasma and capillary blood samples, may be used in outpatient clinics, and has advantages over previous portable monitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miguel et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: