Key result
First-pass recanalization is linked to ~26% higher good functional outcomes vs multi-pass recanalization.
Why the study?
Does first pass recanalization improve functional outcomes compared to multi-pass recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke, and is this driven by speed or completeness of reperfusion?
Cohort (n=3,707)
Yes
Does first pass recanalization improve functional outcomes compared to multi-pass recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke, and is this driven by speed or completeness of reperfusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 46.9% vs 37.2%
The functional benefits of first pass recanalization in acute ischemic stroke are primarily driven by faster reperfusion times rather than the completeness of recanalization, emphasizing the need to minimize procedure times.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: First pass (FP) recanalization, defined as achieving mTICI 2b or higher in a single thrombectomy attempt, has been linked to better functional recovery in acute ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to investigate whether the benefits of FP are primarily driven by higher rates of complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) or by faster procedure times. METHODS: Data from 3707 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or higher) were extracted from the prospectively designed German Stroke Registry (2015-2021). Good functional outcomes were defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at 90 days. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the extent to which complete reperfusion (mTICI 3) and shorter groin puncture to recanalization time contributed to improved outcomes. RESULTS: FP recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes: 46.9% of FP patients achieved an mRS ≤ 2 compared to 37.2% in the multi-pass group. Mediation analysis showed that only 14% of the improved outcomes with FP were explained by higher mTICI 3 rates, while 37% were attributed to faster recanalization times. CONCLUSION: The improved outcomes associated with FP recanalization are primarily driven by the speed of reperfusion rather than the degree of complete recanalization. This highlights the importance of minimizing procedure times and the number of thrombectomy attempts. Strategies aimed at optimizing treatment workflows and improving device design to prioritize early and efficient reperfusion after the FP are critical to improving patient outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03356392).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heitkamp et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=3,707). First pass (FP) recanalization vs. Multi-pass recanalization was evaluated on Good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of ≤ 2 at 90 days). First pass recanalization was associated with significantly better functional outcomes at 90 days compared to multi-pass recanalization (46.9% vs 37.2%), primarily driven by faster procedure times.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: